What was the outcome of Muller v Oregon?
Muller v. Oregon was a Supreme Court case decided on February 24, 1908. It was based on an Oregon law that was passed in 1903 that set working hours for women.
Who was Emma Gotcher in Muller v Oregon?
The case originated when Hans Curt Muller, the owner of the Grand Laundry, compelled Emma Gotcher, unionist and the wife of a leader of the Shirtwaist and Laundryworkers’ Union, to work longer than the ten hours allowed by the state law.
Why did Curt Muller appeal to the Supreme Court?
He was charged with violating the law by allowing a woman at his laundry forced to work more than 10 hours in a given work day. After being convicted and charged with a $10 fine, Curt Muller appealed to the Oregon Supreme Court. Muller claimed that the charges violated his right to freely contract under the US Constitution.
Why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of Oregon?
Women are a special class of worker that needs to be protected.The statute is within the state’s police power to protect the health of the general public because of the physical well being of women is paramount to the production of healthy offspring. The Supreme Court had ruled in favor of Oregon, and so did the majority of the country.
When did the Supreme Court rule that Oregon was unconstitutional?
Oregon was unconstitutional during the published decision of Adkins v. Children’s Hospital. It wasn’t until more than ten years later, in 1937 during West Coast Hotel v. Parrish, the court reversed its opinion and reverted back to its original standing. Section 1.
What was the law in Oregon in 1903?
In response to keeping up with the initiative if the Progressive Era, the state of Oregon followed suit. In 1903, their Legislative Assembly adopted a new bill entitled House Bill Number 89. This bill established a ten-hour work day statute for women that worked in laundries and factories.