What was the difference between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan?
The conflicting interests between the small and large states as brought out under The Virginia Plan forced the smaller states to draft their own plan. The plan drafted by the smaller states was referred to as The New Jersey Plan. The New Jersey Plan was drafted to accommodate one house in its legislature which featured equal representation.
What was the purpose of the New Jersey Plan?
The New Jersey Plan suggested for a legislative arm that was unicameral in nature. Under this form of plan all states within the union would have equal votes regardless of the state’s size. The New Jersey Plan served to amend the Articles.
Why was the Virginia Plan a bad idea?
Noticeably, The Virginia plan drafted by James Madison was in favor of larger states. Due to the aforementioned fact, smaller states within the United States were unsettled by Madison’s drafted plan. The plan posed the danger that if it was approved the smaller states would have no affirmative control over the government.
What was the purpose of the Virginia Plan?
James Madison proceeded to draft The Virginia Plan at the convention, which was intended for the new national government. Fundamentally, the plan drafted by Mr. James Madison (The Virginia Plan) aimed at recommending a robust national government that had the capability of drafting and enforcing decrees and collecting taxes.
What was the difference between the New Jersey Plan and the Great Compromise?
This plan called for every state to receive the same number of representatives regardless of population. The Constitutional Convention ended up adopting both plans through what was called the Great Compromise. The New Jersey Plan would be used in the upper house or Senate. Every state would receive two representatives–no more no less.
What was the New Jersey Plan known for?
The smaller states favored the New Jersey Plan. . This two-house legislature plan worked for all states and became known as the Great Compromise. Nice work! You just studied 10 terms!
Proposed a strong national government. Act only on the states not the people directly. Gives Legislative branch to make laws, individual states were not able to make laws stopping trade between two states. Drafted a plan for a new government called the Virginia Plan. Nice work! You just studied 12 terms!
Why did smaller states object to the New Jersey Plan?
Smaller states objected to this plan because it limited their control in Congress. The New Jersey Plan called for only one legislative house with equal representation by all states. In the end, both plans were rejected.
Why did William Paterson oppose the Virginia Plan?
Both houses would be apportioned per state based on population, so the large states, such as Virginia, would have a clear advantage in steering national policy. William Paterson, representing New Jersey, took the lead in opposing the Virginia Plan. Following two weeks of debate, Paterson introduced his own proposal: the New Jersey Plan.
Who was the Governor of Virginia during the Virginia Plan?
Madison, along with Virginia governor Edmund Randolph, presented a proposal as a contrast to the New Jersey Plan. It contained 15 resolutions. Although this proposal is often called the Virginia Plan, it is sometimes referred to as the Randolph Plan in the governor’s honor. Principles of the Virginia Plan
What was the outcome of the New Jersey Plan?
In the New Jersey Plan, the government would have one legislative house in which each state would have one vote. The New Jersey Plan was rejected, but it led to a compromise meant to balance the interests of small and large states. After being considered, Paterson’s plan was eventually rejected.
What’s the difference between New Jersey and Virginia?
As it can clearly be seen, the executive branch differs in the two plans. The executive plan in the Virginian plan gives wider jurisdiction, national mandate, to the executive, while the New Jersey plan gives the executive power only over the state.
Why was the New Jersey Plan postponed to 14 June?
Consideration of that report was postponed on 14 June at the request of Paterson in order that the small states might have time to prepare a plan “purely federal, and contradistinguished from the reported plan” ( Farrand, Records description begins Max Farrand, ed.,